ethics

I heard a heated discussion on the radio this week about the woman sentenced to stoning in Iran. I had no idea how brutal a form of execution this is, undoubtedly cruel and unusual punishment.

The two sides of the debate boiled down to: can those outside a culture or legal system have the right to criticize or impose their view of ethics/morality on that culture? Does the Universal Declaration of Human Rights have a right to apply? Women and men called in from all over the world on this radio program, presented by the BBC. The discussion also referred to the current debate in France, where there is a new law forbidding women to wear veils that cover their faces. One caller referred to a news report of a woman killing her daughter-in-law for having an affair (considered a crime in her culture); when the woman's daughter testified against her in the U.S. murder trial, the daughter was ostracized and event threatened by her community.

When we talked about these issues in my high school drama class, about 95% of the group thought that countries and cultures have a right to pursue the customs of their religion without interference. "It's their religion," they said. A few students thought it depended on the situation.

How far is too far? Was the verdict in the Mehserle case right? Is what some people call our "occupation" of Afghanistan based on saving human rights, or protecting financial interests? Is lethal injection a violation of human rights, and if so, do other countries have the right to invade us to prevent it? What about genital mutilation as a coming of age custom still in practice?

The next day, the news reported that Iran was not proceeding with the stoning sentence for the woman.

These are all questions that our education should prepare us to face. How are we doing?